本書從具體的、個別的問題為起始點，出入於文史經典之間； 在上友古人的筆端，投注現代人的情感與關懷。 本書選輯了十七篇論文，是作者張亨教授長期讀書和思考的累積。諸篇各自獨立，互不相屬，亦非一時之作，探討的問題雖然分散，但有以下三個基調：（一）大多試從具體的、個別的問題出發，思考其蘊涵的根源性的或思想史 的意義。（二）儘可能依據原典或文本作直接的詮釋。（三）這些詮釋是在一個現代人的存在情境之下、無可解免的前理解中進行的。這必然會有個人理解上的限制，卻也寓寄自我傾注的關懷。 本書用思想史的研究方式，對選擇的論題作追根究柢、溯其淵源的了解。多篇是從較可信的文本中的一兩句話追問起，由微而顯，以期增加理解的深度，而不像一般哲學史或觀念史作周延的概括性的論述。 本書討論較多的是儒家思想，道家的比較少。多篇是從較可信的文本中的一兩句話追問起，由微而顯，以期增加理解的深度，並期使文本脫離異化，而不陷入論辯的泥沼。作者藉助於現代詮釋的觀念，探索所謂文本裡沒有說出的 意義。〈說道家〉與〈說儒家〉兩篇尤多用之。另值得注意的是，作者在討論道家時對於神話的重視，焦點放在莊子、老子如何運用神話；或者他們採取了神話中的那些意義而加以轉化。.

Research on the construction of traditional information science methodology taxonomy is mostly conducted manually. From the limited corpus, researchers have attempted to summarize some of the research methodology entities into several abstract levels (generally three levels); however, they have been unable to provide a more granular hierarchy. Moreover, updating the methodology taxonomy is traditionally a slow process. In this study, we collected full-text academic papers related to information science. First, we constructed a basic methodology taxonomy with three levels by manual (...) annotation. Then, the word vectors of the research methodology entities were trained using the full-text data. Accordingly, the research methodology entities were clustered and the basic methodology taxonomy was expanded using the clustering results to obtain a methodology taxonomy with more levels. This study provides new concepts for constructing a methodology taxonomy of information science. The proposed methodology taxonomy is semi-automated; it is more detailed than conventional schemes and the speed of taxonomy renewal has been enhanced. (shrink)